In
this review Donald Sull is talking about five types of pitfalls that can arise
which may overrule the simple rules of the organisation. He says that pitfall
can arise in many ways and that can derail all the rules built. One of the
pitfalls he talks first is that simple rules are too broad, organisation try do
a lot of process by thinking that they are concentrating only on single process
as such. You should always think about only a single process that can be
brainstorming, acquisition, new product development where you are clear about
the process. Second pitfall he talks about is that rules are too detailed and
sometimes it becomes too overwhelming and confusing to handle. Third way that
simple rule may go bad is that they are too vague, here they mean that even if
they more focus on a particular process but they too little opportunities
because of poor guidance in the working. Fourth pitfall can be having rules
that are too mindless; organisation has rules that are simple but revolves
around without any proper thinking process going into development of the rules.
Fifth rule can be letting the simple rules going beyond the sell by date ie
rules that becomes irrelevant after some years of the working of the
organisation.
Friday, September 28, 2012
Simple rules: Strategy as simple rules
What
are simple rules for strategy and how you are going to make them work in your
organisations and most of the managers try to focus on opportunity strategy but
you should know how to implement this strategy in a large complex organisation.
He talks about how to put strategy in simple rules and to implement in your large
organisation. One of the strategies of simple rule is choosing a process for doing
things that make your organisation into a flow of opportunities, selecting small
no of simple rules so that you can capture the opportunities that you are
looking. There are five simple rules for organisation to capture opportunities
that is available which make others not to pass by. First one is choosing what are
the opportunities available for the organisation, second set of rules is
privatisation ie which project should be concentrated first and what should be done last. Third set of
rule is about process of how you pursue a project. Fourth rule is pacing how
you determine the timing of new product development. Five is pulling up or
deciding when to get out of opportunity ie how to get out of some work when it
is already done. Strategy of following simple rules allows the organisation to
strengthen their chances of sustaining in the market and controlling the
threats that may come.
The
main advantages of simple rule is that it create a balance between too much
structure in the organisation and the confusion that can happen due to
complicated rules which had prevailed for long time. These rules if it clear
and well-articulated that can be circulated through the organisation, these
simple rules also makes it explicit.at the end he talked about pitfalls that
can happen even if you follow the simple rules perfectly.
Simple rules: three logics of value creation
As simple rules Donald Sull, Associate Professor of Management Practice in Strategic and International Management talks about three logics of value creation. He is explaining about dealing with the complexity of the world with simple strategies. He gave the definition of strategy in three simple words, ie strategy is to create capture and sustain. First approach of strategy is value creation through position, identify the attractive market, stake out a position in that market built high barriers to entry so that your competitors are kept away and try to create value he gave an example of military strategy ie to find a high hill and build a fortress around it and keep all the equipment’s ready for use. Second is resource approach to value creation, it is about having our own resources and these resources should be rare, valuable because people pay more for any premium products and your product should be difficult to imitate. If you have such a resources that has all these values as mentioned above, it is very difficult for your competitor to grab the value of the resources you have. Third is opportunity logic of value creation here it is seeing a gap in the world market and identifying the customers and assemble all the resources to remove the gap in the world market here you are not keeping any resources but you are managing the uncertainty of the gap filling the gap. You take only what is left over after paying out for all the resources. This approach of opportunity is very interesting for many managers who are underdogs who have not resources left over, it bring about and is the best approach for volatile and fats moving market.
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Steve Jobs - Real Leadership Lessons
A visionary by nature, Steve Jobs believed in creating products that instilled a need among consumers. The title “father of revolution” is apt for him as Apple designed some of the unique products and left their legacy for the other companies to follow. The journey of Apple was a roller-coaster one. It is only after Steve Jobs became the CEO of Apple in 1995 that Apple saw its way up in the market of PCs and consumer electronics. Steve Jobs prided Apple as a vertically integrated company. The hub and spoke model of Apple with hardware (Mac) as hub and software (iTunes software) as spoke helped in creating a niche for Apple.
The exemplary leadership of Steve Jobs took Apple to great heights. His ideology made the Apple innovative, stylish and premium class. Some of the ideologies of Steve that are learning lessons for other are:
Focus: Focus is important for any business to sustain and survive. As quoted by Steve Jobs, “deciding what not to do is as important as deciding what to do”. The companies should filter out all the distractions that prevent from achieving the goal.
Simplify: Steve Jobs believed in simplifying things for customers. Simplicity is conquering and not ignoring complexities.
Take responsibility end to end: leaders should take responsibility for all the aspects of business.
When behind, leapfrog: innovation is not only about new ideas first; it also looks for a jump when left behind the competition. Apple was left behind in the market of CDs. It did a leapfrog by introducing iPods, iTunes, which would take the other companied somea time to catch up.
Put products before profits: leaders should never run after the profit; if your product is innovative and unique; profits would follow. Don’t be a slave to focus groups: leaders need to intuitive besides being intellect.
Bend reality: leaders should push the limits of the employees and make them believe that there is nothing impossible for them.
Impute: A good idea always is an advantage; but the presentation of the same is very important to leave your trail.
Engage face to face: leaders should promote more meetings in person than through electronic media. It helps in better coordination and communication.
Know both the big picture & details: leader should be able to perceive things at an organisational level as well as at the level of product.
Stay hungry, stay foolish: leaders should always look out for more opportunities and be ready to exploit those.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Case: Apple A
At
the present scenario apple is one of largest vendors of personal computers in
the world with record revenue of US 46.33 billion. Apple always followed a
vertical integrated model for the last few decades which integrate hardware and
software together; this is the main success factor of apple when compared to
other PC makers who does the other way round by outsourcing some of its work to
others.
At
the beginning, when apple was launched it was the idea of Steve to follow
vertical integration strategy for the company because he did not trust any
outside party for product development. Apple was doing well at the beginning
but treat of IBM was growing in the early eighties and the failure apple 3 made
apple to loss its hand in the PC market. Steve jobs realized that IBM PC was
mainly designed for corporate customers and Mac was designed for consumer
market and for the same reason there was disagreement with sculley who believed
in traditional distributor system and want Mac as a business tool. Due to this
disagreement Steve was thrown out of apple which results in the collapse of the
whole company later.
When
Steve was called back to apple after a decade he was very methodical in
allocating his resources , like he cut down the R&D spending and also
removes all the product line to focus only on PC’s and laptops.
In
the early 2000 apple was focusing its innovation in two areas ie hubs and
spokes and was successful up to a great extent. iTunes was another innovative
idea from apple which almost changed the concept of hearing music.
Steve has a different
concept of retailing when he started the first apple store in Virginia, Steve
felt that his products should be sold in separate outlet rather that with his
competitors products which was actually a different concept all together. There
was a halo effect prevailing the market after the launch of apple iPod and
Steve always gave importance to products rather that profit and was successful
up to a great extent.
Is Sony Turning Around?
The year 2009 saw
the pioneer of the world’s consumer electronics, Sony group reporting its first
operating loss in 14 years. They prided themselves in their unique innovative
technology and focus on high quality. Yet their premium-priced products did not
accommodate the changing needs of the consumers for more innovative
cost-effective ideas adopted by their competitors. Isolation from the
technology of the rest of the world and insistence on their own Sony technology
led to the isolation from the rest of the world, or galaponi-zation as referred
by the Japanese. The re-structuring efforts of the company while maintaining
its tradition is a challenging task ahead.
The journey of
Sony from the year 1946 to year 2009 has been a study of its own. The internal
resistance to the change played a big role in shaping the future of the Sony.
The different business divisions and the concept of “company within company”
under Norio Ohga worked well for improving the margins of the respective
divisions but failed in realizing the goals of the company in the long-run. Its
stringent technology measures to support their own technology in every product
and service made them inflexible in the eyes of consumers. For e.g. the sony
mp3 required conversion of the media files; downloading of the music from the contract websites only; slow in
catching up with the LCD technology are a few examples of Sony’s excessive pride in their own
technology. The insider system is also another major hurdle to the
re-structural efforts of the company. The company has a long history of all
Japanese CEOs and the too-many board members prohibited company’s move from
growth and efficiency.
The company hired
a new non-Japanese leader, Howard Stringer for re-structuring. He is made the
head of US. Stringer faced dilemma between the American vision for results and
Japanese worship for tradition. He is also faced with the dilemma of improving
the communication between the different business divisions and the division
heads. The problem of lack of communication was so huge that it affected the
relationship of Sony with other players as Dell, Toshiba. Another problem in
front of Stringer was the proud veterans and engineers. There was no
coordination among the employees; the senior engineers were arrogant and not
gave the due credit to the leader.
The future of the
Sony is very blur if they don’t adapt as Apple and Samsung. The changing needs
of the customers have to be understood. The organization needs to be flexible
for the employees as well for the customers. The Japanese conglomerate may be
out of competition if they don’t incorporate the changes while maintaining
their legacy. The legacy may not come
into a rescue unless the need to preserve it does not urge.
CULTURAL
IMPLICATIONS:
As Sony fall
behind the global competition, it’s time for certain serious re-structuring by
Stringer. Stringer faced the dilemma of striking balance between the American
and Japanese vision. As a non-Japanese leader, it was more difficult to win the
confidence of the employees. The communication process was another major
hurdle. While American believes in frank communication; the Japanese didn’t
believe in communication at all. Stringer will face strong internal resistance
from the employees. They may also perceive it as a threat to their legacy.
OVERCOME INTERNAL
BARRIERS:
Stringer should
focus on improving the coordination among different business divisions so that
the problem of television and audio speakers mismatch does not occur again.
The communication
process should be made more transparent.
The employees
should be rotated from different divisions and countries to learn the cultural
aspects better.
COMPETITIVE
POSITION:
Stringer should
define the focus of the company. The mission and the vision of the company
should be revised.
Incorporate the
technology around the world quicker; delay will give an advantage to other
players.
Another Japanese conglomerate around the same
timeline is Toyota. Toyota is known for the distinguished culture practices at
its workplace. They have been able to incorporate change elements and be
flexible unlike Sony. This uniqueness made them successful globally. Although
they are in different business areas; Sony can take lessons from Toyota to
bring change and be adaptable.
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
The way Starbucks Trains about the Customers Behaviour
Anne Morriss, managing
director of the Concire Leadership Institute, explains how to get satisfaction
by training customers like employees. She is the co-author of uncommon service.
The author discussed
about the customer’s role in increase the satisfaction, encourage untrained
customers, Line between the customer’s and employees.
You have to manage them
as we maintaining the employees.
Job design should be
consider the customer perspective.
The example where the
customers also successfully trained is Starbucks. The major problem with
Starbucks customers is the vocabulary that they are using to get the product in
different sizes and flavors. So they developed a standard Starbucks vocabulary
which helps the customers for effective communication. They created the poster
with star bucks vocabulary which customers can take home to make customers more
interested.
How Starbucks Trains Customers to Behave
Anne Morriss, managing
director of the Concire Leadership Institute, explains how to get satisfaction
by training customers like employees. She is the co-author of uncommon service.
The author discussed
about the customer’s role in increase the satisfaction, encourage untrained
customers, Line between the customer’s and employees.
You have to manage them
as we maintaining the employees.
Job design should be
consider the customer perspective.
The example where the
customers also successfully trained is Starbucks. The major problem with
Starbucks customers is the vocabulary that they are using to get the product in
different sizes and flavors. So they developed a standard Starbucks vocabulary
which helps the customers for effective communication. They created the poster
with star bucks vocabulary which customers can take home to make customers more
interested.
Value Chains versus Supply Chains
The
flow how the value chains are helpful is by explaining the challenge, value
chain thinking, value chain management, key success factors od the value chain
analysis.
The
challenges are economic, social and environmental factors.
The
basic principle of value chain thinking is extending line of sight into
suitable competitive advantage, making process more efficiently by recognizing
specific tasks in cross functional tasks. The supply chain model is adversarial
which affects the each company to each other in which information flow is very
weak and transactional.
But
whereas value chain model is power on shift with simple in principle transforming
supply chain vehicle into a smooth vehicle. It is managed by consumer of
product or service.
The
value chain helps to reduce the cost by removing the uncertainties, helps to
gain the competitive advantage faster by providing the common foot print.
Success factors:
Ø Impact
of smooth chains in operations helps in decision making
Ø Trust
is also one fundamental factor for success and then interdependence,
commitment.
Ø Identify
Change consumer behavior, change the attitudes and make them switch from their brand
Ø Consistent
delivery of product or service
Ø Effective
communication
Ø Identifying
what people want, need and they do
Friday, June 29, 2012
The Core competence of the Corporations
The
growth of the company depends on the ability of it to maximize the advantage of
core competency. The corporation should clearly identify the core competency,
develop an appropriate strategy to cultivate them and establish good platform
in that field.
The
diversified organization finds tough to establish itself and grow continuously
because they have several business units to be taken care of. The market being
dynamic the targets and the boundaries change very frequently.
The
corporation can sustain itself in the market by introducing innovative product
which has very essential features for the buyers to neglect or to develop a new
need for them which the customers haven’t thought of. This is easy to say but
it requires very huge change within the organization. The management should
understand the external environment well and create a strategy which is
flexible. The principles of management have to be reformed since the most of
the activities are just concentrated on the immediate result.
The
corporation has to identify the fields which are complementary and
inter-related to the core competency. This is important in the sense that while
developing the strategy the expertise in inter- related fields will help to improve
the quality of the product.
The
organizations can go for collaboration with the experts of the field related to
its core competency so they can learn about the field make themselves expert in
it.
The
corporation’s structure is also very important for the growth. There may be lot
of smaller units within the organization but they must be centralized so as to
achieve the goal of the company.
The
success of the company on the longer run is highly due to the talent to build a
new product at higher quality, lower cost and in a faster way. They also should
be able to fit and upgrade themselves according to the changing environment.
The
core competency for an organization is like the foundation of the building. The
longevity of the building depends on the foundation and so is the success of
the organization.
The
collective learning in synchronizing diverse production skills and mix various
streams together is known as core competency.
The
core competency enhances on continuous use. It has to be raised and protected
and continuously used to get the expertise in the field.
The
company should concentrate on the process especially related to its core
competency. This is to get an edge over the competitors.
Implementing
core competency doesn’t mean that that lot of research and development has to
be done. The core competency should be unique to an organization and cannot be
followed by the competitors easily. It helps the company to enter various
markets and to provide significant contribution towards the benefits to the
customers.
The
opportunity that arises has to be utilized properly. This will improve the
company’s core competency. The organization shouldn’t lose its core competency
while they are in the collaboration.
The
company to achieve leadership in the core competency tends to increase their
productivity and capture more market share worldwide. The control in the core
products helps the company to lead the way in the future developments of
similar products.
When
the company fails to increase its potential by imprisoning its competency and
diversifying its business tends to lose its position on the market. The
employees with the competency also tend to develop new innovative products and
lose their skills and knowledge slowly.
It
is quite important for the top management to develop its own map to the success
on the basis of core competency and it’s constituent. This will give clear
picture to the employees about the company’s new targets and help them in
achieving the necessary skills. It will also help in allocating the resource
appropriately.
Friday, June 15, 2012
Is Sony Turning Around?
The year
2009 saw the pioneer of the world’s consumer electronics, Sony group reporting
its first operating loss in 14 years. They prided themselves in their unique
innovative technology and focus on high quality. Yet their premium-priced
products did not accommodate the changing needs of the consumers for more
innovative cost-effective ideas adopted by their competitors. Isolation from
the technology of the rest of the world and insistence on their own Sony
technology led to the isolation from the rest of the world, or galaponi-zation
as referred by the Japanese. The re-structuring efforts of the company while
maintaining its tradition is a challenging task ahead.
The
journey of Sony from the year 1946 to year 2009 has been a study of its own.
The internal resistance to the change played a big role in shaping the future
of the Sony. The different business divisions and the concept of “company
within company” under Norio Ohga worked well for improving the margins of the
respective divisions but failed in realizing the goals of the company in the
long-run. Its stringent technology measures to support their own technology in
every product and service made them inflexible in the eyes of consumers. For
e.g. the sony mp3 required conversion of the media files; downloading of the
music from the contract websites only;
slow in catching up with the LCD technology are a few examples of Sony’s excessive pride in their own
technology. The insider system is also another major hurdle to the
re-structural efforts of the company. The company has a long history of all
Japanese CEOs and the too-many board members prohibited company’s move from
growth and efficiency.
The
company hired a new non-Japanese leader, Howard Stringer for re-structuring. He
is made the head of US. Stringer faced dilemma between the American vision for
results and Japanese worship for tradition. He is also faced with the dilemma of
improving the communication between the different business divisions and the
division heads. The problem of lack of communication was so huge that it affected
the relationship of Sony with other players as Dell, Toshiba. Another problem
in front of Stringer was the proud veterans and engineers. There was no
coordination among the employees; the senior engineers were arrogant and not
gave the due credit to the leader.
The
future of the Sony is very blur if they don’t adapt as Apple and Samsung. The
changing needs of the customers have to be understood. The organization needs
to be flexible for the employees as well for the customers. The Japanese
conglomerate may be out of competition if they don’t incorporate the changes
while maintaining their legacy. The
legacy may not come into a rescue unless the need to preserve it does not urge.
CULTURAL
IMPLICATIONS:
As Sony
fall behind the global competition, it’s time for certain serious
re-structuring by Stringer. Stringer faced the dilemma of striking balance
between the American and Japanese vision. As a non-Japanese leader, it was more
difficult to win the confidence of the employees. The communication process was
another major hurdle. While American believes in frank communication; the
Japanese didn’t believe in communication at all. Stringer will face strong
internal resistance from the employees. They may also perceive it as a threat
to their legacy.
OVERCOME
INTERNAL BARRIERS:
Stringer
should focus on improving the coordination among different business divisions
so that the problem of television and audio speakers mismatch does not occur
again.
The
communication process should be made more transparent.
The
employees should be rotated from different divisions and countries to learn the
cultural aspects better.
COMPETITIVE
POSITION:
Stringer
should define the focus of the company. The mission and the vision of the
company should be revised.
Incorporate
the technology around the world quicker; delay will give an advantage to other
players.
Another Japanese conglomerate around the same
timeline is Toyota. Toyota is known for the distinguished culture practices at
its workplace. They have been able to incorporate change elements and be
flexible unlike Sony. This uniqueness made them successful globally. Although
they are in different business areas; Sony can take lessons from Toyota to
bring change and be adaptable.
Apple Inc.
At
the present scenario apple is one of largest vendors of personal computers in
the world with record revenue of US 46.33 billion. Apple always followed a
vertical integrated model for the last few decades which integrate hardware and
software together; this is the main success factor of apple when compared to
other PC makers who does the other way round by outsourcing some of its work to
others.
At
the beginning, when apple was launched it was the idea of Steve to follow
vertical integration strategy for the company because he did not trust any
outside party for product development. Apple was doing well at the beginning
but treat of IBM was growing in the early eighties and the failure apple 3 made
apple to loss its hand in the PC market. Steve jobs realized that IBM PC was
mainly designed for corporate customers and Mac was designed for consumer
market and for the same reason there was disagreement with sculley who believed
in traditional distributor system and want Mac as a business tool. Due to this
disagreement Steve was thrown out of apple which results in the collapse of the
whole company later.
When
Steve was called back to apple after a decade he was very methodical in
allocating his resources , like he cut down the R&D spending and also
removes all the product line to focus only on PC’s and laptops.
In
the early 2000 apple was focusing its innovation in two areas ie hubs and
spokes and was successful up to a great extent. iTunes was another innovative
idea from apple which almost changed the concept of hearing music.
Steve
has a different concept of retailing when he started the first apple store in
Virginia, Steve felt that his products should be sold in separate outlet rather
that with his competitors products which was actually a different concept all
together. There was a halo effect prevailing the market after the launch of
apple iPod and Steve always gave importance to products rather that profit and
was successful up to a great extent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)